AI/ML, Employability and Higher Education - Roundup 07 Apr 2025
The articles collectively highlight the rapid advancement of AI technologies and their growing impact on the workforce, from enhancing productivity to potentially displacing skilled labor. Universities face the challenge of adapting their curricula and teaching methods to prepare students for an AI-driven job market, emphasizing the development of critical thinking, adaptability, and domain expertise alongside technical skills in AI/ML applications.
While most articles acknowledge AI’s potential to enhance productivity, there are conflicting views on its impact on employment. Some sources (Jackson 2025; Kahn 2025) suggest AI will complement rather than replace human workers, while others (Thornhill 2025) warn of significant job displacement. Additionally, there’s a disparity in the perceived readiness of AI for complex tasks, with some articles (Gewirtz 2025) reporting breakthrough capabilities, while others (Wong 2025) emphasize AI’s persistent limitations in reasoning and adaptability.
- Jackson (2025) reports that while AI can perform tasks in about two-thirds of jobs, there’s no role yet that AI can do entirely on its own. This highlights the need for universities to focus on developing students’ uniquely human skills like adaptability and emotional intelligence alongside AI literacy.
- Caddy (2025) introduces lesser-known AI tools that enhance productivity in various domains, suggesting universities should expose students to a diverse range of AI applications beyond just the major platforms.
- Ming (2025) discusses the evolving role of product managers in training AI agents, indicating that universities should prepare students for new job roles that bridge technical AI knowledge with domain expertise and user needs.
- Thornhill (2025) argues that wealthy cities may be surprise losers from AI automation, challenging assumptions about which jobs and regions are most vulnerable to AI disruption. This underscores the need for universities to prepare students for a rapidly changing job market across all sectors and locations.
- Plumb (2025) details how American Express uses AI to increase efficiency across various business functions, showcasing the practical applications of AI in enhancing expert labor. This case study provides valuable insights for universities on the real-world implementation of AI in corporate settings.
- Wong (2025) profiles François Chollet’s efforts to prove AI’s limitations in reasoning and adaptability through the ARC-AGI test. This research highlights the importance of teaching students to critically evaluate AI capabilities and limitations.
- Kahn (2025) explores the potential of AI agents to transform work processes, emphasizing the need for universities to prepare students for a future where AI assistants are commonplace in various professions.
- Hogan (2025) raises concerns about the low detection rates of AI-assisted cheating in universities, highlighting the need for educators to develop new strategies for maintaining academic integrity in an AI-enabled world.
The articles collectively paint a picture of rapid AI advancement that is reshaping the workforce and challenging traditional notions of education and skill development. While AI shows promise in enhancing productivity and taking over routine tasks, there remains a crucial role for human skills such as adaptability, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. Universities face the dual challenge of integrating AI literacy into their curricula while also fostering the uniquely human capabilities that will remain valuable in an AI-driven economy. The future workforce will likely need to be adept at working alongside AI, understanding its capabilities and limitations, and applying it strategically within their domains of expertise. As the landscape continues to evolve, ongoing adaptation and lifelong learning will be key for both educators and students to navigate the AI-transformed job market successfully.
-
Changes in the broader labour market: Educators must prepare students for a job market where AI is increasingly prevalent across all sectors. Thornhill (2025) suggests that AI’s impact may be more widespread than previously thought, affecting even traditionally stable, high-skill jobs in wealthy urban centers. This implies that educators should foster a broad understanding of AI’s potential effects on various industries, encouraging students to develop adaptable skill sets that can withstand technological disruption (Jackson 2025; Kahn 2025).
-
Changes in jobs and tasks within jobs: The integration of AI is reshaping job roles and the tasks within them. Ming (2025) highlights how product managers are now expected to train AI agents, illustrating the evolution of existing roles to incorporate AI expertise. Plumb (2025)’s case study of American Express demonstrates how AI is enhancing expert labor across multiple business functions. Educators should focus on teaching students how to work alongside AI, emphasizing skills in AI oversight, interpretation, and strategic application within their chosen fields.
-
Types of study students must undertake: To thrive in the evolving labor market, students need a combination of technical AI literacy and strong foundational skills. Jackson (2025) emphasizes the importance of developing “soft” skills like curiosity, adaptability, and emotional intelligence, which AI cannot easily replicate. Simultaneously, exposure to diverse AI tools (Caddy 2025) and understanding their capabilities and limitations (Wong 2025) is crucial. Educators should design curricula that balance hands-on experience with AI technologies and the development of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and domain-specific expertise. This approach will enable students to leverage AI effectively while maintaining the higher-level analytical and professional skills that will remain distinctly human.
Sources
Caddy, Becca. 2025. “Forget ChatGPT, Try These 5 Genuinely Useful AI Tools You’ve Probably Never Heard of Instead.” TechRadar, March. https://www.techradar.com/computing/artificial-intelligence/forget-chatgpt-try-these-5-genuinely-useful-ai-tools-youve-probably-never-heard-of-instead.
Gewirtz, David. 2025. “Gemini Pro 2.5 Is a Stunningly Capable Coding Assistant - and a Big Threat to ChatGPT.” ZDNet, April. https://www.zdnet.com/article/gemini-pro-2-5-is-a-stunningly-capable-coding-assistant-and-a-big-threat-to-chatgpt/#ftag=CAD-03-10abf5f.
Hogan, Fintan. 2025. “AI Cheats ‘Slip Under Radar’ as Few University Students Penalised.” The Times, April. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/education/article/ai-cheats-slip-under-radar-as-few-university-students-penalised-56kpcv6pp.
Jackson, Ashton. 2025. “Indeed CEO: About Two-Thirds of Jobs Include Tasks That AI Can Do—but There’s No Posted Role yet AI Can Do ’Completely on Its Own’.” CNBC, March. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/indeed-ceo-most-jobs-still-cant-be-performed-by-ai-alone.html.
Kahn, Jeremy. 2025. “AI Agents Are Here. How Afraid Should Workers Be?” Fortune, April. https://fortune.com/2025/04/01/ai-agents-jobs-automation/.
Ming, Lee Chong. 2025. “Microsoft’s CTO Says Product Managers Will Help Train AI Agents.” Business Insider, April. https://www.businessinsider.com/product-managers-train-ai-agents-microsoft-chief-technology-officer-scott-2025-4.
Plumb, Taryn. 2025. “How Amex Uses AI to Increase Efficiency: 40.” VentureBeat, April. https://venturebeat.com/ai/how-amex-uses-ai-to-increase-efficiency-40-fewer-it-escalations-85-travel-assistance-boost/.
Thornhill, John. 2025. “Wealthy Cities May Be Surprise Losers from AI Automation.” Financial Times, April. https://on.ft.com/4leQeb5.
Wong, Matteo. 2025. “The Man Out to Prove How Dumb AI Still Is.” The Atlantic, April. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/04/arc-agi-chollet-test/682295/?utm_source=apple_news.