AI/ML, Employability and Higher Education - Roundup 03 Mar 2025

Posted on Mar 3, 2025

The articles highlight the widespread adoption of AI across industries, from creative professions to coding and finance, and its impact on the nature of work and skills required in the job market. Universities must adapt their curricula and teaching methods to prepare students for an AI-driven workforce, focusing on developing critical thinking, creativity, and ethical AI use alongside technical skills.

While most articles emphasize AI’s potential to enhance productivity and create new opportunities, some highlight concerns about job displacement and the need for stronger regulations. There are also differing views on the pace of AI adoption, with some sources indicating rapid integration across sectors, while others suggest a more gradual uptake.

  • Hope (2025) describes how Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al Nahyan of the UAE is investing heavily in AI, highlighting the geopolitical implications of AI development and the need for international cooperation in AI governance. This article is relevant as it demonstrates the global scale of AI investments and the importance of preparing students for an internationally competitive AI landscape.
  • Smith (2025) discusses how AI is affecting worker pay across various industries, emphasizing the need for workers to adapt their skills. This is relevant to higher education as it underscores the importance of teaching students how to work alongside AI and develop skills that complement rather than compete with AI.
  • Weale (2025) reports on the widespread use of AI writing tools among university students, highlighting the need for universities to adapt their assessment methods. This article is directly relevant to higher education, as it challenges traditional teaching and assessment practices and calls for new approaches to ensure academic integrity in the AI era.
  • Criddle and Heikkilä (2025) explains the concept of AI model “distillation” and its potential to make AI more accessible and cost-effective. This is relevant to education as it suggests that AI tools may become more widely available, requiring students and educators to understand and utilize these technologies effectively.
  • Schmidt (2025) argues that AI could usher in a new renaissance in human knowledge and capability, transforming various fields including education. This article is relevant as it highlights the potential for AI to revolutionize learning and research methods in higher education.
  • Crumley (2025) discusses how AI might spark a shift to an “innovation economy,” emphasizing the need for creativity and human skills alongside technical knowledge. This is highly relevant to higher education as it suggests a need to focus on developing students’ innovative thinking and uniquely human skills in addition to technical competencies.
  • Davies (2025) proposes using AI to rethink annual reports, suggesting broader applications of AI in financial analysis and reporting. This article is relevant to business and finance education, highlighting the need to teach students how to leverage AI for complex financial tasks.
  • Edwards (2025) reports on research showing faster AI adoption in less-educated areas, challenging assumptions about technology diffusion. This is relevant to higher education as it suggests a need to consider diverse adoption patterns when preparing students for the workforce and may indicate areas where additional education and training are needed.

The articles collectively paint a picture of rapid AI integration across various sectors, highlighting both the opportunities and challenges this presents for higher education. While AI promises to enhance productivity and create new innovative possibilities, it also demands a shift in educational focus to prepare students for an AI-driven workforce. Universities must adapt by teaching AI-related skills, fostering critical thinking and creativity, and emphasizing ethical considerations. The global nature of AI development also underscores the need for an internationally-minded approach to education that prepares students to compete and collaborate in a global AI landscape.

  1. Changes in the broader labour market: Educators must prepare students for a rapidly evolving job market where AI is becoming ubiquitous across sectors (Smith 2025; Crumley 2025). This requires not only teaching technical AI skills but also fostering adaptability, critical thinking, and ethical decision-making abilities that will remain valuable as AI reshapes industries.

  2. Changes in jobs and tasks: AI is transforming job roles by automating routine tasks and augmenting human capabilities in areas like data analysis, content creation, and decision-making (Criddle and Heikkilä 2025; Davies 2025). Educators should focus on teaching students how to effectively collaborate with AI tools, emphasizing skills that complement AI such as problem-solving, creativity, and interpersonal communication.

  3. Types of study needed: Students must develop a combination of technical AI literacy and domain-specific knowledge to thrive in the evolving labour market (Schmidt 2025; Weale 2025). This includes understanding AI’s capabilities and limitations, learning to use AI tools responsibly, and developing higher-level analytical and critical skills that allow them to leverage AI effectively within their chosen fields. Additionally, educators should emphasize the importance of continuous learning, as the rapid pace of AI development will require ongoing skill updates throughout students’ careers.

Sources

Criddle, Cristina, and Melissa Heikkilä. 2025. “AI Companies Race to Use ‘Distillation’ to Produce Cheaper Models.” Financial Times, March. https://on.ft.com/4ijoIa1.

Crumley, Bruce. 2025. “Why a Senior LinkedIn Exec Believes AI Will Spark a Shift to an ‘Innovation Economy’.” Inc, February. https://www.inc.com/bruce-crumley/why-a-senior-linkedin-exec-believes-ai-will-spark-a-shift-to-an-innovation-economy/91153514.

Davies, Daniel. 2025. “Time to Deploy AI Robots to Rethink Annual Reports.” Financial Times, March. https://on.ft.com/3QLPxrD.

Edwards, Benj. 2025. “Researchers Surprised to Find Less-Educated Areas Adopting AI Writing Tools Faster.” Ars Technica, March. https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/researchers-surprised-to-find-less-educated-areas-adopting-ai-writing-tools-faster/.

Hope, Bradley. 2025. “The Sheikh’s Gambit.” WIRED, March. https://www.apple.com/news/.

Schmidt, Eric. 2025. “Opinion | AI Could Usher in a New Renaissance.” Wall Street Journal, February. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/agi-could-usher-in-a-new-renaissance-physics-math-econ-advancement-ed71a02a.

Smith, Lydia. 2025. “Does AI Mean Less Pay for Workers?” Yahoo Finance, March. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-pay-workers-jobs-060033748.html.

Weale, Sally. 2025. “UK Universities Warned to ‘Stress-Test’ Assessments as 92.” The Guardian, February. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/feb/26/uk-universities-warned-to-stress-test-assessments-as-92-of-students-use-ai?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other.