AI/ML, Employability and Higher Education - Roundup 02 Dec 2024
The articles collectively highlight the ongoing integration of AI in workplaces and its potential to reshape employment and skill requirements. They emphasize the need for universities to adapt their curricula and teaching methods to prepare students for a future where AI will be a significant part of professional environments, focusing on developing critical thinking, adaptability, and domain-specific expertise alongside AI literacy.
While some articles (Speed 2024b) suggest that AI’s impact in the workplace is currently minor with more discussion than implementation, others (Khalaf, Harding, and Kay 2024; Tiernan 2024) indicate rapid advancements in AI capabilities and their integration into business operations. There’s also a contrast between the view that companies will develop their own AI models (Khalaf, Harding, and Kay 2024) and concerns about data privacy and the use of personal information for AI training (Speed 2024a).
- Speed (2024b) reports that UK employees perceive AI’s current workplace impact as minor, with more discussion than actual implementation. This article is relevant as it highlights the gap between AI hype and reality, suggesting that education should focus on practical AI applications and critical evaluation of AI potential.
- Khalaf, Harding, and Kay (2024) predicts that companies will increasingly develop their own smaller-scale AI models for specific operations. This insight is crucial for educators to understand the evolving AI landscape and prepare students for a future where customized AI solutions are commonplace in various industries.
- Tiernan (2024) discusses the continuous improvement of AI models, particularly in self-correction and task planning. This article underscores the importance of teaching students to work alongside evolving AI systems and to understand their capabilities and limitations.
- Speed (2024a) addresses concerns about Microsoft using customer data to train AI models without explicit permission. This highlights the need for educators to incorporate data ethics and privacy considerations into AI-related curricula.
- Vigliarolo (2024) reveals that over half of long-form LinkedIn posts are AI-generated, raising questions about authenticity in professional networking. This article emphasizes the importance of teaching students to critically evaluate online content and maintain authenticity in professional communications.
The articles collectively paint a picture of AI as an increasingly important but not yet dominant force in the workplace. While its potential is widely recognized, actual implementation and impact vary. For universities, the challenge lies in preparing students for a future where AI is ubiquitous, requiring a balance between teaching technical AI skills and fostering the critical thinking and adaptability needed to work alongside evolving AI systems. The ethical implications of AI, particularly regarding data privacy and content authenticity, also emerge as crucial areas for educational focus.
-
Changes in the broader labour market: Educators must prepare students for a labour market where AI is increasingly prevalent but its impact varies across sectors (Speed 2024b; Khalaf, Harding, and Kay 2024). This includes teaching students to anticipate and adapt to AI-driven changes in their chosen fields, and to develop skills that complement AI rather than compete with it.
-
Changes in jobs and tasks: The articles suggest that while AI may not be replacing entire jobs, it is changing the nature of tasks within jobs (Tiernan 2024; Khalaf, Harding, and Kay 2024). Educators should focus on teaching students how to leverage AI tools to enhance their productivity and decision-making, while also developing uniquely human skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence.
-
Necessary student preparation: To thrive in the evolving labour market, students need a combination of AI literacy and domain-specific expertise (Khalaf, Harding, and Kay 2024; Tiernan 2024). Educators should integrate AI concepts across disciplines, teaching students how to interact with AI systems, understand their limitations, and apply them ethically. Additionally, emphasizing high-level analytical skills and the ability to critically evaluate AI-generated content is crucial (Vigliarolo 2024).
Sources
Khalaf, Roula, Robin Harding, and Chris Kay. 2024. “Infosys Chair Bets Companies Will Develop Their Own AI Models.” Financial Times, November. https://www.ft.com/content/c1dd7f62-95a4-42cb-92ca-7a5d1ece6716.
Speed, Richard. 2024a. “Microsoft Hits Back at Claims It Slurps Your Word, Excel Files to Train AI Models.” The Register, November. https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/11/27/microsoft_word_excel_ai/.
———. 2024b. “Brits Think AI in the Workplace Is All Chat, No Bot for Now.” The Register, December. https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/12/01/uk_workplace_ai/.
Tiernan, Ray. 2024. “AI Isn’t Hitting a Wall, It’s Just Getting Too Smart for Benchmarks, Says Anthropic.” ZDNet, December. https://www.zdnet.com/article/ai-isnt-hitting-a-wall-its-just-getting-too-smart-for-benchmarks-says-anthropic/.
Vigliarolo, Brandon. 2024. “Yup, Half of That Thought-Leader Crap on LinkedIn Is Indeed AI Scribbled.” The Register, November. https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/11/28/linkedin_ai_posts/.